![](http://lh4.ggpht.com/_FoXyvaPSnVk/S40PYaKVcsI/AAAAAAACkTA/B-C8PkX8HyM/2010-FEB-Post-Under.jpg)
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgumrBcGJf7JaFOucaCCIm1F3NemMtZXpnFJCXpS1-HblMujYA_EpyvFMPoT8S7rQV9XELx92FC63BtmQida3ypLn0H4byuL9pMWGRBPHArA6M0iXBVfK0KNnfBYPNewpxg3N0jt5FYTuA/s800/Detroit-3-0.jpg)
Sean McAlinden, an economist working for the Center for Automotive Research, says that due to shifts in UAW retiree / health planning US auto manufacturers may end up with a labor-cost advantage in the next few years. GM is used as the prime example.
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjePR0obIKKak967r04LYazlh9Ir-IFYMEWjFT6uKeeZ1FD8s5J1cWSox7H4KYpyJYKeyhJhICCqh-fvr363k__0-HMPQ82xx5HPj1K1Pk52tQ2-35gnCCT0RFaYgEyGidWawql1fIDguA/s200/Detroit-3-2.jpg)
In 2007, per-vehicle labor costs for GM were $1,400 more than Toyota, its largest international competitor. $950 of that was for retiree benefits.
In 2008, Detroit's Big 3 manufacturers (Ford, GM and Chrysler LLC) were reportedly paying their hourly employees $69,368 per year on average versus $70,185 being earned by employees at foreign-owned plants. Salaried employees at the Detroit automakers were making $122,963 versus $81,506 earned by foreign-based counterparts.
Now, after all the re-negotiations, GM is working towards a new goal: "[hiring] more workers at the lower wage and it [hiring] fewer skilled-trades workers, who make more money than other factory workers".
With 2,300 new employees working under the revised wage/retirement plans, GM's employees are only $2 more costly than Toyota's. McAlinden predicts that over the next 5 years, GM may even undercut Toyota's pay by up to $10.
By Phil Alex
Via: AP / AN (Sub. Req)
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiKc4SC0IuKpWA6177L8WLRB8-7nqUMa7is4FNpv-1NtDF-CN5YHyRwdqq1enCHqVbnGMCd2uv0Xz2jrHhlahsrIDuoHgsYeB0z2L_FoDVH5BCebv68QJnI8WAkIENnyB4o9QM9IXWBvw4/s400/Detroit-3-1.jpg)
0 comments:
Post a Comment